Alabama was the model for future stolen elections
ALABAMA CANNOT EVEN PROVE THE VOTES WERE COUNTED AT ALL.
I am sure by now everyone out there has seen the clear and sympathetic yet blatantly fraudulent explanation for how Moore lost. The explanation, which has been given by some MSM and even many "friendly" alt media types goes like this:

"Moore lost because he was a flawed candidate who was slandered and "we cannot allow this kind of slander anymore". "People just could not get past the slander and believed he actually did it, and conservatives just could not bring themselves to put a molester in office". "So not enough conservatives went out and voted, and with such a high number of blacks voting, Moore lost".

This story sounds at least tenuously plausible, and if it works, "they" will use it. I cannot see how anyone who is real alt media would ever believe it, or publish it, especially when the court order which allowed the tally to be deleted immediately after the election was highly indicative of planned fraud and made it possible for election officials to publish a fully false, never counted "result". If asked to prove they counted the votes, they can just say OOPS, we deleted the count.
Even our enemies in media are to a degree "acting sympathetic" and saying Gee, maybe that election was not fair because of the slander against Moore, but it happened, and we must accept the results. PROBLEM: It did not happen that way and if we "accept the results" a win is a win, and tyranny wins.

Here is what actually happened
The false allegations against Moore were hugely and widely exposed LONG AGO and did not affect him at all. He completely rebounded. From all legit social media posts I have found, voter turnout by conservatives exceeded the 2016 election and Moore should have had more votes than Trump did. But they were votes that were never considered and never counted, because the vote totals that actually got used for the count were already decided by corrupt poll officials before the election, who then lied and said only a few turned up to vote. HERE IS PROOF:

There is a cold hard reason why the Alabama supreme court made an unprecedented final hour decision to allow all accountability for the vote to be destroyed immediately after the election. Folks, the only way that would happen is if they blatantly stole the election before a single vote was cast, and the court was in on the steal. They knew it was such a landslide for Moore that people would seriously question his loss, and the only way to shut up critics of the "results" was to simply have no results they could question. I have seen even scamming alt media types say that deleting the electronic record did not matter. Question: IF IT DID NOT MATTER, WHY THE F*** WAS A FINAL HOUR DECISION MADE TO ALLOW IT? I have the clear and perfect answer here.

There was no count. And in the interim between now and any "recount," these corrupt poll officials are going through all the ballots RIGHT NOW and are making the vote "correct". With no electronic record left they will get away with it. This is a perfect model for stealing elections. It starts by simply lying about what the initial electronic tally was (or not making one at all), then they "delete" that tally, and then before a recount of anything on paper is done, they work overtime and make the paper match. They have a LOT more time to work on this than they did on election night, they will get it done.

It would be easy to explain it all away by saying the dead voted. I am sure they did. It would be easy to explain it all away by saying fraudsters came in from neighboring states and rigged it due to a lack of an ID check. I am sure they did. And it would be easy to explain this by saying they were busing people around to different polling locations. I am sure they did. But the landslide for Moore was so huge that even taking those measures did not cut it, and they feared they would not cut it, so they had everything in place to scam the vote entirely, behind closed doors, ahead of the election. The situation in Alabama is so blatant that it best matches the scenario of no votes being counted at all.

There is proof of that being precisely the case. At the end of the count, when it was supposed to be predominantly democrat votes getting counted, Moore stayed within a few thousand votes of Jones the whole way. THAT IS IMPOSSIBLE. If his base hated him enough to put it close at the time his opponent's votes got counted, he should have been slam dunked into the trash. He was not. The tally simply ended within 0.04 percent of what it took to not trip an automatic recount. It was so hoaxed that only an AI could have managed it that well, UNLESS, OF COURSE, IT WAS ALL DECIDED AHEAD OF TIME, AND NO VOTES ACTUALLY GOT COUNTED AT ALL. THAT WOULD BE A GREAT REASON TO HAVE THE COURT ALLOW THE RECORD OF THAT COUNT TO BE "DESTROYED," RIGHT? Now, if they are asked to prove they counted the vote, they can just say they deleted it. That makes sense.
FOLKS, IF THE COURT ALLOWED THE TALLY RECORD TO BE DESTROYED, YOU CAN'T PROVE A COUNT EVER HAPPENED.
THE ONUS IS NOW ON ALABAMA. PEOPLE NEED TO STAND UP AND DEMAND THEY PROVE THE VOTES EVER GOT COUNTED AT ALL. AND THEY CAN'T PROVE IT. THEY CANNOT PROVE IT.
There is no explanation for what happened in Alabama, so if anyone has one, don't play stupid and accept it.

If even an alt media talking head says there was a way for Moore to have lost legitimately, and we believe it, we face a future in all elections that is JUST LIKE ALABAMA. If anyone in alt media says there was a way for Moore to have lost, they are either too stupid to remember what things were like a few days ago, or never paid attention, or most likely fake opposition.

http://82.221.129.208/.zp1.html