I sent Jim Stone a question from "reader m." about why Mr. Stone considered Israel responsible for the Fukushima disaster. I had posted his initial discussion an earlier thread.

Here is Jim Stone's detailed response from his site
http://82.221.129.208/baaasepagel5.html:
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Nothing came in on this topic through the mail,
But a very popular forum wanted me to explain why Israel would destroy Fukushima. Here is the short answer: Japan was rebellious and said no to gifting the World Bank 160 trillion yen. I don't know if Japan knew Israel could follow through on a blackmail threat but Israel did, and the result was a weak earthquake lied up to a 9.0, a nuclear tsunami, and destruction of Fukushima by an Israeli security team Tepco let into the facility in the months leading up to the disaster. IMPORTANT: The week before the disaster, the entire Israeli security team, which consisted of 12 people, went on vacation to Israel and left the security duties to Japanese people they hired for that time period. Very convenient.

The security firm's star product was a 3d stereoscopic camera that weighed over a thousand pounds and was mysteriously identical in scale and form to a gun type nuclear weapon. The cameras that were outside the facility monitoring the perimeter were legit, and had cameras in the barrel that occupied the entire barrel. But the camera that was confirmed to have gone under reactor three, in the torus area, had surface mounted cameras that did not penetrate the barrel. It was, to scale, an exact functioning replica of a gun type nuclear weapon. We all saw the results, and now, SIX FREAKING YEARS after the disaster, they finally got a decent look at reactor 1 and confirmed nothing happened to it, only the containment was destroyed. This can be explained by how robustly reactors are built. CURIOSITY: IF THERE WAS NO BREACH, WHY IS EVERYTHING LETHALLY RADIOACTIVE? Obvious answer: A failed gun type nuke went off there. And at reactor 2 then. And reactor 4, which blew itself to heaven despite not even having a core in it had a better functioning nuke. Obviously ALL the blasts were follow up on a blackmail threat, with the blast at 3 putting on the best show.

There is no conceivable way hydrogen gas did it, because 1. all the containments were completely purged with nitrogen to eliminate ALL explosion potential, and 2. Fukushima was equipped with a system that got rid of hydrogen if it did develop, and that system was functioning all the way through the disaster, and 3. The inner containments at all reactors were completely destroyed, and ALL inner containments had concrete in the bottom portion that was between 12 and 18 feet thick. All reactors had this section of the containment shattered. There is no way in hell a little loose hydrogen gas would ever do that.

So that leads us right back to square 1: Cameras that were identical in scale and form to gun type nuclear weapons, and inexplicable lethal radiation left behind at reactor 1, despite it now being proven no radiation ever escaped the reactor. If they ever do manage to get a look at that camera, and it is completely vanished, and word gets out to the general public, Israel is gonna have a Japanese hot sauced squid up it's @ss.

This is not hoax or assumption. The Fukushima report was fully endorsed by 1 of the 4 engineers who designed reactor 3. I interviewed him for two hours and he said the report was accurate, but he could not agree Israel would ever do it. He got angry with that so I did not push it. He was 89 years old. I can't give his name out.

All of what I talk about is in the Fukushima report and was properly documented with syntax as accurate as an old school machine coded computer program. That report is a masterpiece. Unfortunately, revisionists have wiped out most of the referenced materials because they just could not have that report be as it was, so well documented. But the main points that report makes are still 100 percent accurate:

1. There is no way Fukushima could have been destroyed by a tsunami, even if the story unfolded the way the official story did. There were too many backup systems and endless safety backups and only one layer of that was gone with the generators. There were so many other redundant systems that the official story is a standing lie, nothing could have possibly happened, even with the official story line. To have the worst possible outcome at all reactors, even at reactor 4, which was completely dis-assembled and had no core is beyond laughable, it is an outright rotten and transparent falsehood. Obviously that facility was destroyed with weaponry.

2. The earthquake was only a 6.6 and was centered 100 kilometers inland. People said it did not feel natural. There were no significant structural collapses in all of Japan. The only building that fell was an old welfare shelter located at the true epicenter, inland. Out at sea, where the tsunami originated, peak seismic intensities only hit 5.3

Anyway, Claudia is sitting here at 1:30 AM ready to pass out. It is time for bed.

Emergency workers were confused by the nature of the casualties, which were all water related, and had none of the lacerations and broken bones and crushing injuries that normally accompany an earthquake. This is because there was no significant earthquake and no seismically collapsed buildings, only tsunami damage.

3. The U.S. navy was in the area placing submerged "sonobouys". Obviously then, one or more sonobouys that was dropped into the Japan trench was a bottom seeking nuclear weapon, that went off to trigger the tsunami. With the earthquake a proven 6.6 that was lied up by the media but recorded as a 6.6 by all the Japanese seismic stations, obviously the tsunami, which originated well over 100 miles from the epicenter of a relatively weak inland earthquake was produced by the properly timed detonation of a submerged nuclear weapon.

All of this is impeccably documented in the Fukushima report, linked at the top of this page by clicking the image of Maga BSP's "OWL". I got the complete seismic record on top of the original seismogram from the true epicenter, all the reactor diagrams, all the photographic proof in the world that the tsunami was not natural, and early on I had the full Sendai damage report that proved there was no significant earthquake, only a tsunami. That report was subsequently destroyed so it could not be referenced. It was simply too damning.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~