Suspicions often abound around police instigated "defensive" shootings and/or murder. And, for good reason. This is a main reason why they hate to be videoed during confrontations...So how do these fellows get these "throw away" weapons anyway?? Well according to several sources they just pick them up from used evidence piles of guns and etc. which are supposed to be destroyed after the trial, but somehow simply disappear...for a while. "Gardening" is simply a euphemism for "planting"...

WASHINGTON, DC — A disturbing confession by John Elliot, a former Fairfax County police officer, illustrates exactly what happens when cops try to get away with murdering American citizens.

Recall all of the cases you’ve heard of officers shooting someone and moments later conveniently “finding a gun” near the dead person’s body.

In these cases, the victim’s family will typically come forward and state that their dead loved one never had a gun and, in fact, never even owned any guns or knew how to use them.

But once the story of a gun being “found” on the victim is promulgated by the mainstream media, the family’s testimony gets drowned out.

How is it that these guns (sometimes knives) keep showing up on people after being shot by police?

The answer: throw-away weapons.

Throw-aways, or what are sometimes called drop weapons, became very popular in Iraq. Some US troops would carry a few throw-away AKs in their vehicles.

The idea behind having throw-aways is that when you kill an innocent person, you can plant the throw-away weapon on them moments after their death.

This allows you to maintain that the victim — who will now be named a “suspect” by Statist media outlets — was armed, that you had no choice but to shoot him, and that you “feared for your life.”

Quite literally, a throw-away weapon allows you to get away with murder.

Crime scene investigators will show up and take photos of the throw-away weapon planted near the victim’s dead body.

These photos are then circulated in State-controlled media, flashing on the screen for entranced viewers.

Sincere but misguided citizens then take to the internet and defend the cop’s action, saying things like “I’m usually the first to point out police brutality but in this case the guy had a gun! The officer was just defending himself, it was justified.”

Alas, appearances can be deceiving; in the world of law enforcement, appearances are always deceiving. What you see is not what you get. And what else would you expect from individuals who receive professional training in how to lie to people?

http://filmingcops.com/remember-this-when-the-media-tells-you-the-cop-had-to-shoot-him-because-he-was-armed/