Guccifer 2™ hack that is probably white hats somewhere is now available in full
Jim Stone, Freelance Journalist
Oct 6, 2016
http://82.221.129.208/basepagei4.html

THE BACK STORY: Yesterday the image of Guccifer (marketed as Guccifer 2) did the first part of a huge data dump on the Democrats, which proves they received kickbacks from the banker bailouts and live by "pay to play". It was erroneously stated to be a Clinton foundation hack so the Clinton foundation took advantage of that and issued a "truthful" response saying it was fake.

PROBLEM: it was not fake.

Though it is titled a "Clinton foundation hack", the hack is broader than just a Clinton foundation hack. YES, tons of Clinton foundation documents are there, and tons of documents regarding other democrat crimes are there. I really don't know how it was done, because the data rape was so complete. It had to be the NSA that did this, and the intelligence agencies are now in a tug of war beteen the dark side and the white hat side (my guess, and it is only a guess.) There are no "insider contacts" or "rumors circulating" with this one as far as this web site goes.

How do I know it is real, and how do I know there is a battle between good and evil in the intelligence agencies? SIMPLE:

1. It is extremely implausible that any individual could have nailed so much stuff. This is over a million documents in total, the type of data cache that you won't just find on a single hacked machine. This is a full spectrum data rape of an entire criminal infrastructure (and yes, it was a criminal infrastructure)...

And

2. It is censored where possible. The huge black intelligence juggernaut was activated yesterday to blow it off the web. Now it is available at Atlantia online with a password of Caligula36 but if you are in the U.S. (and a few other locations) it is censored and will not come in. And it might already be censored at this location for everyone. This is going to be a big whack-a-mole game.

The open public password says it all
The manner in which it was posted (requiring an open public password) proves that it was getting censored when linked yesterday, and the only way to get it public was to put it in a web cache somewhere with a password that Google could not get beyond to notify the authorities it was available somewhere and had to be wiped out. THAT ALONE PROVES IT IS REAL, AND PROVES IT WAS CENSORED because to keep it available anywhere, it had to be hidden behind a password.

WHY WOULD A PASSWORD BE NEEDED TO KEEP IT AVAILABLE LONGER? ANSWER:

It is a primary function of Google to notify the authorities when something they are interested in gets posted. Google hits the entire (meaningful) web (including this web site) once every 8 minutes or so (and I hate that, because google does this web site no good at all, only damage.)

All they have to do is tell Google to look for a string of text that only appears in what they want banned and Google will automatically provide practically instant feedback telling them when something pops up somewhere. Norobots command does not work to stop it. SO GUCCIFER(tm) HAD TO PUT THE FILES BEHIND A PASSWORD, SO GOOGLE COULD NOT NOTIFY THE AUTHORITIES. That is why this time around the Guccifer files were password protected, with an open public password.

All of this means, beyond all doubt, that this data drop is the real deal. If it was fake, they'd shout it to the world and laugh at it. They would not instantly wipe it whenever it is posted, forcing "Guccifer" to keep it out of the watchful eye of Google.

IF YOU CANNOT SEE ANYTHING ABOUT THIS ANYWHERE ELSE, IT IS BECAUSE "THEY" ENGAGED THE CENSOR BOT TO WIPE IT EVERYWHERE

I am getting a little bit worried, it looks like the censorship really is stopping this. They are now trying to front it as a hoax.

But the problem is that all the social media posts on this topic were exploding last night, and then suddenly just froze where they were 1 hour after this broke. There is no explicable reason for this other than a massive ability to shut it all down from a central location which would never have been used if this was a hoax. Even my message window got shut off entirely, and I can't see where or how that was done. The only thing that works is the front page. Conclusion: NOT A HOAX, and the control over the web is far more vast than anyone ever expected.

Guccifer 2.0 is not the Guccifer that is in jail, and he was asking for server space to host it all because it was too much. This would be expected if it was not a hoax. Someone else did this drop which is why it is Guccifer 2.0 and I suspect it is the Russians or white hats that actually provided the files, and they have to make it all look plausible (like an individual who might have problems getting enough space for all the files online.)

The coincidence with this and Assange yesterday lends credibility to it all. It appears Assange used a front.

Hillary and the rest of the elite scum are asking for bullets to fly their direction by blocking this, and the bullets probably won't be from the general public. They will be from a powerful entity that does not want world war 3. Someone somewhere did the hack and it was not "joe Guccifer". That much is obvious. And that someone will be far more capable of taking direct physical action than "Joe guccifer" ever could be.

UPDATE: It looks like Hillary's team really is using NSA hackware against people, this time to stop this leak from spreading. The method? To attack people's computers and destroy them. The only reason I am still up is because you can't write to the ROM chip my specially configured computer runs from, but they did try to attack and kill the CPU. If I had a normal setup, the hard drive would now be gone and as it is, they already made the laptop produce a burning smell while the CPU fan went to max.