Grassy Knollers and 9-11 Truthers, There’s a Meta-Issue Here
by Mary W Maxwell, PhD, LLB

A widow in shock, Jacqueline Kennedy, age 34, with President Johnson and Ladybird, on November 22, 1963:

I have just seen a story, in a Veterans’ magazine, about a former Navy Seal, Michael Calabrese, who may have been murdered as punishment for whistleblowing, or about-to-be whistleblowing. He apparently died by “weighted drowning.”

I ask: Does it matter if the whistleblowing was about corrupt politicians, or conspirators in JFK’s death, or the inside job of September 11, 2001?

In Calabrese’s case, it’s proposed that somebody drowned him because he knew about the Controlled Demolition of the WTC towers. Specifically, it is alleged, he knew that switches were hidden in vending machines, to be used as relay devices for the explosion.

I ask: What would be the point of amateur investigators chasing after the specifics of Calabrese’s findings? Wayne Madsen (the best of amateurs, and one with many covert-agency friends) has already checked out the company that sold the vending machines. He found a connection to Rahm Emanuel (Obama’s White House Chief of Staff, later mayor of Chicago). But so what?

I ask: Is there any reason, at this point, to dig into the details of the method by which the controlled demolition of the three WTC buildings took place? Will it help us one iota, re 9-11?

I also ask: Even if we obtain solid proof – such as by a confession, or a videotape of Calabrese’s drowning -- that he was killed because he knew about the explosions, would that put a brake on whistleblower deaths?

What if we could clearly identify who killed JFK -- would that cause any changes to come about? We must be grateful to the many amateurs who’ve spent years of their life researching “Dallas,” but why pursue any further analysis when there’s abundant proof of a coup d’etat that the authorities CHOOSE TO IGNORE?

As early as 1965, Sylvia Meagher published “Accessories After the Fact,” showing the involvement of government in the assassination. And by 1967, New Orleans District Attorney Jim Garrison had identified key parts of the conspiracy during his prosecution of Clay Shaw. (The government climbed into his case and wrecked it. Natch.)

Similarly, Elias Davidsson, in his book “Hijacking America’s Mind on 9-11,” has made a watertight case against the US government, re the hoax of 19 hijackers. Thus, shouldn’t we be looking at the real issue, the meta-issue that is holding back a resolution to these problems? Surely it is the fact that the law of the land is not being enforced.

Start Focusing on Paid Upholders of the Law

The United States today is a spectacle of injustice. Persons who draw a regular salary for upholding the law are not doing their job. I am referring to judges, cops, attorneys, legislators, law school professors, members of the Department of Justice (what a name!), editors of law journals, coroners (don’t get me started on coroners), court clerks, and so forth.

As a result of their hopeless inaction we have assassinations of leaders, murders of whistleblowers, wars based on blatant false-flags events, mass killings of citizens, poisoning of the environment, you-name-it. The baddies never get punished. Never. What does that tell you?

Neither do the baddies get formally identified, although in many cases everybody knows who they are. Just like in a third-world country. Ahem, aren’t we supposed to be The Great Republic? Don’t we have “Rule of Law”?

Please name one Congressperson, one judge, or one law professor, who has undertaken to handle this particular issue, or has even mentioned its existence. I CAN NAME NO SUCH CONGRESSPERSON, JUDGE, OR LAW PROFESSOR! Yet a Congressperson’s yearly pay is $174,000 (plus a benefits package). Top judges make $250,000. Some academic lawyers do even better that that!

Of course I won’t cite here the mainstream media professionals who should be telling us what’s going on. For over a century the Fourth Estate has worked for someone other than the readers of the newspaper or the TV viewers. They do terrible things to us, but I’m concentrating here on persons WHOM WE OUT-AND-OUT PAY TO UPHOLD THE LAW.

Some of these may claim that other duties justify their wages. A cop has to deal with traffic accidents. A law teacher must communicate a raft of legal precedents to students. A court clerk may have to waste her time on a vexatious litigant. [Hello?]

Sure, a job can keep you busy, but when a mass killing is committed, e.g., 9-11, there’s plenty of black-letter law to deal with it. If the salaried upholders-of-law can see what justice calls for, but remain resolutely silent about it, does that silence qualify as a sin of omission or a sin of commission? I say it’s definitely the latter.

Sylvia Meagher said of the 1964 Warren Commission Report, re Kennedy’s death, “It was appalling to find out how many of the Commission’s statements were unsupportable or even completely contradicted by the testimonies and/or exhibits.”

Wow. Did any law professionals then deal with her excellent findings? Nope. No way. And that’s been true for a half-century. It also set a norm for subsequent commission reports… and will continue to do so.

Grassy Knollers, It’s Up to Us

We citizens who are called “grassy knollers,” (a synonym for “conspiracy theorists’), are more or less aware of who did what in some of the horrendous public crimes. We cannot do much to get at those various wrongdoers. But we can easily get at the lazy, compromised, or just plain guilty “upholders” of law.

We can, if nothing else, demand their resignation. Just make noise about them. I suggest, as a slogan: “Stop paying them to hurt us.” And don’t worry, it can’t be seditious, or a threat to national security, to gossip about the lazy bums’ laziness.

Is there any reason why criminals such as Rupert Murdoch, Henry Kissinger, or Bill Clinton are walking around enjoying life without the slightest worry that the law will come after them? The main reason must be: our acceptance of the spectacle of injustice. I say we are all to blame. Everyone. That includes grassy knollers.

Consider the members of the so-called 9-11 Commission. It’s beyond doubt that every one of them engaged in obstruction of justice and cover-up, when producing their famous report. It has often been pointed out that they edited-out some damming evidence. For example, they did not publish the sworn testimony of a most relevant official, Norman Mineta.

Members of the 9-11 Commission

Mineta was US Secretary of Transportation, for Pete’s sake, at that time. His words implicate the US Vice-President in the 9-11 attack on the Pentagon! (I’ll pass over the fact that Mineta has since become a partner in the CIA-run public relations firm Hill and Knowlton….)

Jailhouse Rock

Trust me. Calling for the resignation of lazy law enforcers would do a lot of good. Americans really don’t want to think about the reality of JFK’s assassination. They are resigned to it. They don’t want to confront the issue of 9-11. They are too scared. But money talks.

(Note: when I write articles about big crimes, like 9-11 or weather weapons, I hardly ever get replies, but when I wrote an article for rense.com, entitled “Law Deans Bring Home the Bacon,” folks were suddenly interested.)

Let’s not forget, too, that obstruction of justice is a crime. In the codification of federal law, the following are specified:
18 USC 1505 Obstruction of proceedings by a department or agency (!), 18 USC 1513 Retaliation against a witness (no kidding), and 18 USC 1506 Theft or alteration of records.

That last one says “Whoever feloniously steals… alters… or otherwise avoids any record, process… in any court of the US… whereby a judgment is reversed… or does not take effect… shall be fined or imprisoned… up to five years.…”

Good. We’ll have to empty out a lot of San Quentins to make room for these creatures. Generally speaking, I have often noted that the written law is beautifully complete and has anticipated human nature very well.

The Knoll Itself

This year I got a chance to visit the actual grassy knoll in Dallas. Needless to say, it’s not marked with a plaque, since the “Federal Bureau of Investigation” (what a name!) suppressed the testimony of the many eyewitnesses who saw gun-smoke coming from the knoll on November 22, 1963.

I also inspected the nearby “Sixth Floor Museum.” Pretty outrageous. It is dedicated to passing on to millions of tourists the notion that “Oswald” was the assassin, and that he worked his magic from a window on the sixth floor of the Texas Book Depository. The tourist can peek at the gunman’s perch from the next room. You’re not allowed to actually look out the offending window!

As a teenager in Boston in 1963, I was attending a make-up class in high school when the shooting of Kennedy was announced. (That’s ‘make-up’ as in learning to put make-up on, not as in a remedial class). The teacher said, “We will pause now to pray for the president.’

OK, that was 51 years ago. That’s enough of a pause, isn’t it? Let’s get into some action mode here. And let’s cogitate on the fact that we citizens ourselves are the roadblock to “solving the problem of 1963.”

-- Mary W Maxwell, PhD (Politics), LLB, is the author of “Prosecution For Treason” (Trine Day Press, 2011), and of the article “The Reality of World Government” at Gumshoenews.com. Her forthcoming book is “Fraud Upon the Court: Reclaiming the Law, Joyfully.” Fancy that.

Please see the video below, from her Youtube channel “Mary W Maxwell.”