Dear RM Agents and Readers,

This is frightening and makes absolute sense in what we see in the scientific and medical field. It is logical on how it happened and why the truth of things can be so important.

Once a lie has gone so far; others who supported the lie, knowingly or unknowingly are often so caught up in the affects that the lie created; it often becomes difficult to accept the truth. The continuing minutiae; without pause to adjust for the lie will bring to your door the, Titanic and it will come crashing in when you can least afford it.

In our world, it often means a loss of financial,friends and redefining self; yet it is the best choice!

Yet, once you know and you understand and you can PROVE it, it is best to come forward with the truth as the lie continued creates more lies and becomes self perpetuating and the DEVIL Knows it
and will use it against you.

Remember the information from over 700 peer reviewed articles that tell you that LYME disease is Chronic. Time for truth.

READ THIS BOOK: http://www.plaguethebook.com/

Remember if the doctors have been trained incorrectly; they will believe in what they are doing even if it is wrong. Put that in your fortune cookie.

Many Blessings,
CrystalRiver

----------------------------------------------------

SCIENTIFIC REGRESS
by William A. Wilson

May 2016

http://www.firstthings.com/article/2016/05/scientific-regress

he problem with ­science is that so much of it simply isn’t. Last summer, the Open Science Collaboration announced that it had tried to replicate one hundred published psychology experiments sampled from three of the most prestigious journals in the field. Scientific claims rest on the idea that experiments repeated under nearly identical conditions ought to yield approximately the same results, but until very recently, very few had bothered to check in a systematic way whether this was actually the case. The OSC was the biggest attempt yet to check a field’s results, and the most shocking. In many cases, they had used original experimental materials, and sometimes even performed the experiments under the guidance of the original researchers. Of the studies that had originally reported positive results, an astonishing 65 percent failed to show statistical significance on replication, and many of the remainder showed greatly reduced effect sizes.

More at this link:

http://www.firstthings.com/article/2016/05/scientific-regress