A response from CGI member, Mike.

The near future promises to be immeasurably irksome.

Imagine that gov had a means to keep you alive but that there was factually no cure.

"A drug candidate for treating adverse reactions caused by pathogenic antibodies inducible by COVID-19 virus and vaccines."

https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2021.07.13.452194v2

Imagine learning that the shit shot you were convinced to receive was actually designed to make you susceptible to recurring sickness.

Imagine that gov offers the relief, the life if, and only if, you obey.

Imagine that the offer is made with that smirk that only gov can make.

Imagine the horrid, helpless shame you would burn with for being such a fool that you believed in covid 19 against all of the evidence opposed to it's very existence and you took the shot.

This should result in the frenzied mass annihilation of the Cattlemen. But they posses life, if you obey.

The name of this new existence is Stockholm. By well crafted meme (mind virus) the citizens of Stockholm will come to love their new way of living and will perform mightily for reward.

The push for 70% shit shot goal would be considered to be the minimum required for a pack/herd of maskers to overcome the remaining individuals. 90% would be more realistic. Deep burning shame released is just not genuine courage, but it would make the maskers feel vindicated in some deranged way.

The problem is that Smirking Hubris is itself against the wall of time. It's running out for them. And they know that.

http://cgi.rumormillnews.com/cgi-bin/forum.cgi?read=12203

(For what it might be worth, Clif High once cited an interesting bit of data whereby a time would come when the UV would be so intense that one would have to wear eye protection or risk being blinded by the sun. Almost there.)

The only realistic way out of this madhouse is to make "them" prove beyond any doubt whatsoever that the covid 19 virus does in fact exist and that it does cause the damage that "they" claim it does. Any other approach is tacit agreement on your part that the virus does exist and is dangerous.

They have charged you with the crime of contagion. You are in "their" court. It is "their" game. You cannot win if you are tacitly agreeing that the virus is real and dangerous.

The Texas health order stated clearly that if a mask caused mental or physical health problems for an individual then that individual could state health exempt and NO-ONE could challenge that statement. There were no qualifications for health problems and there was no enforcement against that statement. NO-ONE in Texas ever had to wear a mask, period, unless he just chose to. And twenty some odd million people chose to be too stupid to apprehend that the barn door was wide open, not even on the hinges. They chose to ignore the legal fact that there was no danger. The covid 19 meme, the mind virus, was successful.

That same covid 19 meme is still successful in that efforts against suppression are tacitly agreeing that the virus exists and that suppression is necessary. The entire nation is caught in this loop.

The prosecution has charged contagion therefore the prosecution must prove transmissible agent beyond any doubt. No other demand has standing.