Simply quit using them and ALL their many clones. YES, even MOST are 'google aided' search engines.

Not only does Google get to charge their many advertisers for 'clicks', but they ALSO filter their replies to your queries to --

1) place some (non PC) sites WAY down the list... even like on page 10, while placing all the PC ones (their pit smoke) on page one.

2) make a record of your searches (subjects) which they sell to spammers who saturate your email inbox with junk. (Did you ever search for say 'baking soda toothpaste, and then receive 2-3 emails about some 'wonderful new toothpaste or tooth brush?

Of course you did. It is not a mystery. It is the AI they employ, which makes them money while causing you grief..

3) and of course, forward some of your searches to big brother instantly while recording all of them for posterity.

Well, yes, there are some relatively new (and apparently honest) search engines that don't have those google quirks.

And I am not talking about duckduckgo. ddg STILL uses google, but they don't track you (they claim).

IOW, using ddg STILL makes google some bucks. I now have Yandex as my default search engine on Firefox. Yandex is really cool. If you search for some news event the PTB wants to suppress and compare to duck duck or google, you will see what I mean.

Jim Stone lists two on his site. http://82.221.129.208/.wf7.html

----------------------------------------

Yandex and Yippy are totally independent of Google
I don't know why anyone would want to use Duck Duck and other Google supported search engines when all they do is serve what Google gives them. Duck Duck and others are a front end and nothing more. They MAY provide privacy but who's to say they are telling the truth about even that?

SO, I did a search of Space Shuttle Columbia ground penetrating radar this morning on Duck Duck and got a bunch of impenetrable CRAP about the disaster, with no reference whatsoever to ground penetrating radar. But Columbia was FAMOUS for it and even got published in National Geographic. Evidently Joogle does not want people knowing they can't hide in bunkers, they can only seek shelter in them - ANYWAY,

So I considered trying Yippy and instead went to Yandex on second thought and BOOM, everything about the shuttles and ground penetrating radar was right there, in spades, on top. Yandex gave me what I asked for. Search engines that are powered by Google have been doing that a LOT less lately.

Yippy, which is now powered by IBM's Watson (oh gosh, whatever) at least put the fact that ground penetrating radar was used by the shuttles on the front page. So Yippy is better than Google too, but not up there with Yandex.

Space shuttle based ground penetrating radar is one of those topics I am sure some people wished the sheeple forgot about. It is a perfect test of a search engine's legitimacy. So whatever search engine you use, type Space Shuttle Columbia ground penetrating radar and see what comes up. If it is nothing but the Columbia disaster, the search engine is crap. If it at least mixed in ground penetrating radar, it is not trying to hide anything, and will probably work very well for other searches also.

Obviously Google combs the web constantly and will probably find this post, and an AI will likely temporarily fix this, (maybe not, but maybe.) Wait and see if Google scurries away from the spotlight when exposed.

So why was I looking up ground penetrating radar on the shuttles? Because of Epstein's island, see the next report.