I assume nothing. I posted it as I had not seen anything similar
before (apart from Shylers website last year).

I remember how hard it was to ever get on that website, when that
occurs, I always try hard to get there because there might be something to it. It has always struck me as odd that some sites, which contain truly explosive information(if it were true) are never shut down, under attack or even hard to get to.

Zetatalk for example. If that stuff was true, word for word, do you really think that it would be so easily accessible?

On the other hand, S. Skolnick has another website which has the same address as his main one but without the "s" in the middle
(ie) skolnickreport.com
It is not accessible & has not been so for a number of years --- he has stated that its because of a particular piece of information on the old site --- he wanted his other stuff out there so he didnt put the story on the new site.(thats all from memory, but I think i've got it right).

The successful conspiracy media are often used to suppress other,
lesser known researchers --- the hard part is working out whos for real & whos not. My money is on the people doing the hard yards, not on the fatcats who sell stuff to the dreamers.

Sangraal

: No, You're making a mistake in assuming that David Shayler is
: a genuine dissident. He's not. That is simply the role he's
: performing so as to help distract attention from genuine
: dissidents like Tomlinson and his explosive affidavit.
: So whilst you're busy with Shayler his "disclosures"
: you may just happen to miss a crucial occurance, like when
: they kill Tomlinson.
: Now is that politically correct enough for rumormillnews? . .
: . the home of free speech?